Today in one of the levels of classes that is for students have never really gotten good enough to be pushed up the the next level with confidence, I nearly had a mental breakdown trying to explain an extremely simple test. I had been well prepared for the fact that if I didn’t give them all of the information required to finish the test, they wouldn’t be able to do it. While I can confidently give spelling tests to students much younger in all my other classes, these students are "special", in that they can’t do much on their own.

I created, what I thought, would be an elegant solution to the problem. I wanted to test the student’s ability to recall the synonyms and antonyms of words we’ve been studying together for three weeks. I told them to prepare to be able to name words by recognizing their definitions, or words with similar meanings. I modeled the test after an activity in the book. I gave them a list of words or definitions, then placed all the possible answers in a word bank at the top of the page. All any student needed to do was look above, copy the proper word next to the correct synonym or antonym. I even told them what to do in Korean as I handed out the test, the best I could.

Immediately students threw up their hands and said, "I don’t know the first answer. I don’t know how to do this. I’m not going to do this at all." If there is anything that angers me off more as a teacher, it’s the unwillingness to try even the slightest bit. These are, of course, the worst of the worst students for this particular level that react with such impatience. I went around individually with every single student that had difficulty and explained it to them until they understood. One particularly dense student took for explanations from me, his neighbors, and everyone in class, and he still didn’t know what he was doing.

Meanwhile, the students that tried managed to get about 70% of the same test completed before they ran out of time. They still failed, and I gave them many, many hints to get them there, but at least they showed me it wasn’t the test’s design that made their results. It was the fact that none of the students had studied.

I warned there would be a retest tomorrow, and it would be a "don’t go home from school if you fail the test" sort of retesting. All the bad students whined about needing to leave as quickly as possible, either because of other schools or due to the bus. I told them they better not fail if that is the case, so come to class prepared to do well. The marginally better students corrected their tests with the time they had left after I returned it to them, and I made sure everyone left with the correct answers for the test tomorrow.

I was pretty upset, so when I returned to the teacher’s room, I mentioned the situation to my director. She started questioning me about the reactions of different students in the testing situation. Who did well? Who did poorly? Who tried? Who didn’t? After I was finish naming names, she prepared a list. She suggested to the head teacher that she moved the higher level students to another class, and leave that class for all the students that couldn’t do anything from day to day. Instead of having students that almost pass a test, I’m going to be left with students that would rather stick a pencil up their nose than study. If that class gets subdivided and my "almost tolerable" students get split off, I might go crazy on a student before the end of the year. I think this is something they should consider in a class I see three times a week.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • e-mail
  • Furl
  • StumbleUpon
  • TailRank
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis