Our school director told us that for the month of February, we’d be using a series of books popularized in Seoul. They were focuses on TOEFL IBT, which is my specialty in the school for middle school and upper level students. The difference was we’d be starting this with elementary school students, and that we’d only have a month to finish the entire book.

Any logic involved in this decision wasn’t run by me first, let me assure you. The book she chose seemed decent, if we had twice the time to teach it, it might even be “moderately good”. I should learn my lesson about judging books…

On the very first day, the VERY first set of examples had a typographical error. The teacher’s answers has mistakes. Sometimes questions don’t correspond to anything in the text, as if they edited the book heavily and didn’t correct all the subsequent changes. There are really lame pattern exercises that waste students time. The other material would be suited for a class twice the length I have to teach, so I spend most of the time skipping pages and assigning it for homework.

Today, the publisher of the book came to show us the “Online” portion of the book. This was completely unannounced. I had set aside time to grade papers, as I needed to turn them in before the secretary ran out of things to hand back to students. This guy shows up and does a demo on the school’s computers. Instead of doing it with one computer and the rest of us watching his tutorial, he tries to have us all log into his system and try it for himself. Instead of a quick five minute demo, I lose 20 minutes of paper grading time. Not a nice start to my day.

I admire the effort of creating an online component to an otherwise subpar book, but this was a huge waste of time. His demo didn’t work. He wanted us to record the sample dialogs for the students to listen to. I’m not sure, but I think that would be the book PUBLISHERS responsibility, not mine. I didn’t see any cash being offered as an enticement to get me to do voice work. I’m not offering my voice to some random shady guy that tells me to record something for him. Also, if FOUR teachers are supposed to record in a room right next to each other, how will that even be comprehensible to a listener? Think about the limitations of the system a little bit please?

His website to show off what the student would do to submit an answer didn’t work. There is no way for us to know what he was going to do with any of that information, and no way for US to utilize or grade the materials either.Maybe there was, but once he started blaming the slow computer connection on what was clearly a poorly designed website, I got tired of his excuses. If you don’t have a working demo ready, don’t call a meeting. Don’t these people have ANY business sense?

I took up the issue of the very poor editing and typographical errors in his book. He gave me a smarmy answer about how they’d catch and fix the errors. I wish I had kept up with my hobby of catching the errors in the book and circling them in red pen. Then I would have had something to throw at his head when he said this. Claiming to improve future editions is fine and dandy, but seeing as I never intend to EVER choose this book series again, it’s moot.

However, I think the “program” has a little more lasting power than I knew about before today. I’m a little nervous some sort of deal has made them a partner to our school. Our school’s logo is now featured on their site, and if that means I’m going to have to continue to work with this awful program I’m going to be a bit annoyed. I haven’t seen any advanced copies of the next book in the series to see if it gets better, but I really want to hold onto the autonomy that I usually am given to choose books at our school.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • e-mail
  • Furl
  • StumbleUpon
  • TailRank
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis